Newsletters by Sponsors

본문 바로가기
KOR
인하우스카운슬포럼

[법무법인 광장] Amendments to the KFTC Merger Review Guidelines

페이지 정보

Date19-03-12 11:41

본문


상단 이미지

Amendments to the KFTC Merger Review Guidelines

The Korea Fair Trade Commission (the “KFTC”) recently amended its Guidelines for Merger Review (the ”Guidelines”), which took effect from February 27, 2019.  The Guidelines now provide for particular issues relating to “innovation markets” and “big data” that will be considered during the KFTC’s review of mergers within R&D-intensive (i.e. innovative) industries.
I. Major Amendments
1. ‘Big Data’ defined as “Information Assets”

Information AssetsData (i.e. information) sets consisting of data collected for varying purposes and managed, analyzed or utilized in a systematic and integrated manner.
2. ‘Innovation Market” definition for mergers within innovative industries

Innovation MarketIf innovation is essential to, or there is continuous innovation competition in, the industry in which the merger parties operate, and one of the merger parties is a significant innovator, then a separate “innovation market” may be defined, encompassing  the area of innovation alone, or ② the area of innovation, together with the relevant products/services to which that innovation relates.
3. Market concentration and anti-competitiveness assessment criteria for mergers within innovative industries or involving Information Assets

Criteria for Assessment of Market Concentration in Innovation Markets

The degree of market concentration in an innovation market will be determined based on criteria such as amount of R&D expenditure, size of R&D assets and capacity, patent portfolios (number of patents or utilizations thereof), or the number of competitors competing in the relevant R&D activities.

Criteria for Assessment of Competitive Effects of Mergers in Innovation Markets

Whether one of the merger parties is a significant innovator in the relevant industry.
The proximity or similarity of the merger parties’ previous or current R&D activities.
Whether a sufficient number of innovators actually competing will remain post-merger.
The gap in innovative capacity that may result between the combined entity and remaining competitors.
Whether the merger is a means of eliminating potential competitors from the relevant product market.
Criteria for Assessment of Competitive Effects of Mergers involving Information Assets
Whether the merger is the only available means of acquiring the Information Assets.
Whether the combined entity would have the ability or incentive to restrict competitors’ access to its Information Assets.
Whether restricting access to the combined entity’s Information Assets would restrict competition
Whether the merger may restrict non-price competition due to a reduced incentive of the combined entity to improve its quality of services relating to the collection, management or utilization of its Information Assets.
II. Implications of the New Amendments
As can be seen by major information technology company mergers such as the Facebook/WhasApp merger in 2014 and the Microsoft/LinkedIn merger in 2016, foreign competition authorities have recently had to consider particular issues inherent to M&A transactions involving R&D and information assets, such as the potential for barriers to entry and network effects. 

Similarly, the KFTC also considered innovation harm during its review of the 2015 merger among semiconductor equipment manufacturers.  However, back then, there was no means to predict whether the KFTC would find anti-competitive effects within an innovation market, or what the KFTC would view as anti-competitiveness from a merger of information assets, due to the lack of clear guidelines.

Through the Guidelines, the KFTC attempts to clarify the standards for determining the competitive harms that may result in innovation markets, as well as anti-competitive effects from mergers involving information assets.  However, the Guidelines are still worded in abstract terms and the KFTC has yet to provide further guidance on how the Guidelines would actually be applied. Accordingly, absent further clarification from the KFTC regarding application of the Guidelines, it is still difficult to predict exactly how the Guidelines would actually affect future merger reviews, and increased uncertainty is anticipated in how clearances will be granted in related M&A transactions, as well as the potential remedies that may be imposed.

However, it could be argued that the Guidelines provide a basis for anti-competitive concerns based on innovation harm or anti-competitiveness resulting from a monopoly on information assets (for example, in acquisitions of R&D-intensive companies) or when companies are in possession of significant information assets, even in a scenario where such targets may not yet possess significant market shares.  Accordingly, companies seeking to undertake acquisitions in innovative industries (i.e. involving significant R&D) or of information assets (i.e. such as in industries involving significant data accumulation, such as telecommunications, SNS, or finance), should take particular care regarding the above-mentioned concerns and are advised to seek legal counsel throughout their M&A preparations and during the merger notification process.
─ CONTACT ─
변호사 정환
Hwan JEONG
T:+82.2.772.4940
E:hwan.jeong
@leeko.com
Profile >
Genny S. KIM 
T:+82.2.6386.6269
E:genny.kim
@leeko.com
Profile >
Kee Won SHIN 
T:+82.2.6386.6322
E:keewon.shin
@leeko.com
Profile >
For more information pertaining to this newsletter, please contact the attorneys identified on the right.
The Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter is provided for general information purposes only and should not be considered as the considered as the rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter service, please click here or reply to this email stating UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. The contects and opinions expressed in the Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter are protected by law against any unauthorized use.
Title
[부스러기사랑나눔회] KB국민은행과 함께하는 역사문화체험, 참 특별한 하루
[법무법인 광장] ILO 핵심협약 비준 관련 주요 법률 개정안
[부스러기사랑나눔회] 꽃보다 예쁜 우리의 아이들입니다!
[법무법인 광장] 2019년 개정 세법 주요 내용
[법무법인 광장] 韩国大法院首次判决认定对游戏构成要素的选择、排列或者组合的侵害属于著作权侵权
[부스러기사랑나눔회] 진정한 부스러기 가족이 되다!
[부스러기사랑나눔회] 아이들에게 희망이 되는 선생님들을 온 맘 다해 응원합니다!
[법무법인 광장] 이득액 5억원 이상의 사기·횡령·배임 등 범죄를 저지른 경우 임직원 취업 제한 확대 시행
[법무법인 광장] 유명 아티스트의 가치에 편승하는 행위에 대해 소속사에 대한 권리 침해 첫 인정
[법무법인 광장] 대법원이 최초로 게임 구성요소의 선택, 배열 또는 조합에 대한 저작권 침해를 인정하는 판결 선고
[부스러기사랑나눔회] 노후 공간이 쾌적해져서 아이들이 너무 좋아해요!
[부스러기사랑나눔회] 아이들 마음 속에 공부하고 싶은 마음이 있었나봐요!
[White & Case] WHITE & CASE ADVISES ECAs AND LENDERS ON €2.7 BILLION FINANCING OF YUNLIN OFFSHORE WI…
[부스러기사랑나눔회] 가정의 해체 속에서 꿈과 자신감을 잃었던 우리 다정이가 이렇게 달라졌어요!
[부스러기사랑나눔회] 설렘으로 가득한 가족여행!
게시물 검색

In-House Counsel Forum

Address : 17F, 625, Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Registration Number : 107-82-14795

Representative : CY Park

E-mail : reps@ihcf.co.kr

Tel : 02-6091-1998

Copyright(C) IHCF KOREA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

View PC version.