후원로펌 뉴스레터

본문 바로가기

HOME > 후원로펌 현황 > 후원로펌 뉴스레터

후원로펌 현황

[Lee&Ko Intellectual Property Group Newsletter] Lee & Ko Successfully Suspended Automatic Reduction of Innovator Drug Price

페이지 정보

작성일18-10-06 19:09

본문



상단 이미지

Lee & Ko Successfully Suspended Automatic Reduction of Innovator Drug Price, Despite Market Launch of Generic Drugs in Korea

  • Statutory Obligation to Reduce Innovator Drug Price

Under the Korean National Health Insurance Act (the “Act”) and related rules and regulations, even during the patent term of an innovator drug, in case the prices of potential generic drugs are registered with Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service(“HIRA”) by generic companies for eventual market launch, the innovator drug price is automatically and mandatorily reduced.  Such reduced innovator drug price can be recovered to its original price, only if there is a final judgment from the Korean Supreme Court, the highest appellate court in Korea, holding that the generic drugs infringe the innovator drug’s patent.

Therefore, the generic companies who do not respect the innovator drug’s patent term, but go ahead with their generic launch incur irreparable huge damage to the innovator company because of the automatic price reduction.  Moreover, such damage suffered by the innovator company grew bigger due to the recent amendment of the Act, which permitted larger reductions of the innovator drug price (53.55% of their original price).


  • Suspension of Automatic Price Reduction Through Administrative Proceedings

Against the backdrop of the above, Lee & Ko has successfully represented an innovator drug company, a multinational pharmaceutical company, in administrative proceedings to object and suspend the automatic drug price reduction.  Such suspension of automatic reduction was granted for the first time since the Act has been in effect for the past few decades.  Lee & Ko argued in the proceedings that: (i) registering potential generic drug price with MFDS is effectively an infringement of the innovator drug’s patent, and thus, should be considered illegal; (ii) mandatory reduction of the innovator drug price imposed on the innovator company based on such illegal act by the generic company is not fair and should not be permitted; and (iii) enforcement of such automatic price reduction incurs irreparable damage to the innovator company, and thus, the enforcement should be suspended.  It took only ten days from the administrative petition submitted for the suspension of automatic price reduction that Lee & Ko obtained a favorable decision from the administrative court on behalf of its client.

 

  • From Now, Unless Innovator Drug’s Patent Is Finally Invalidated, Irreparable Damage from the Automatic Price Reduction Can Be Prevented

In light of the favorable decision obtained by Lee & Ko above for the innovator drug company, unless innovator drug’s patent is finally invalidated in the Supreme Court, the innovator drug company may bring administrative proceedings at any time during the term of its patent to suspend the mandatory and automatic price reduction, which is triggered when generic companies prepare for their market launch and register their generic drug price with HIRA.

─ CONTACT ─
Keum Nang PARK
Keum Nang PARK
T:82.2.2191.3036
E:keumnang.park
@leeko.com
profile>
Jung Hyun UHM
Jung Hyun UHM
T:82.6386.6256
E:junghyun.uhm
@leeko.com
profile >

 

For more information pertaining to this newsletter, please contact the attorneys identified on the right.
The Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter is provided for general information purposes only and should not be considered as the considered as the rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter service, please click here or reply to this email stating UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. The contects and opinions expressed in the Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter are protected by law against any unauthorized use.


후원로펌 뉴스레터 목록
번호 제목 날짜
1755 [법무법인(유한) 태평양] EU 탄소국경조정제도 시행과 우리 기업의 대응 이슈 2023-05-02
1754 [법무법인(유한) 태평양] 「중대재해처벌법위반 사건 동향 - 2호 판결 선고 2023-05-02
1753 [법무법인(유) 화우] EU 집행위, 그린 클레임 지침(안) 발표 2023-04-28
1752 [법무법인(유) 화우] 퇴직자 관리 시스템 구축 필요, 영업비밀 유출 대비 2023-04-28
1751 [법무법인(유) 화우] EU 탄소중립산업법 및 핵심원자재법 초안 발표 2023-04-28
1750 [법무법인(유) 광장] 금융위원회, 「AI 기반 신용평가모형 검증체계」 및 「금융분야 AI 보안 가이드라인」 마련 2023-04-28
1749 [법무법인(유) 광장] LNG선 특허 라이선스 관련 시장지배적사업자의 끼워팔기 행위의 위법성을 인정한 대법원 판결 2023-04-28
1748 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 미래노사경영연구소 이슈리포트 - 기간제 근로자와 갱신기대권 법리 2023-04-27
1747 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] Weekly_Legislative_Report_Week_of_April_17_to_April_21_2023 2023-04-27
1746 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] PB-Report-2023년-4월호-발간 첨부파일 2023-04-27
1745 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 주간입법동향_vol.110 2023-04-27
1744 [톰슨로이터] 2023년 법조계의 떠오르는 ESG 주제 및 트렌드 2023-04-26
1743 [법무법인(유) 광장] 빌트인가구 담합 사건 - 검찰의 독자적인 담합 수사의 시발점 2023-04-25
1742 [SHIN & KIM] 요양병원 적정성 평가에 관한 제도 변경의 문제점 및 대응방안 2023-04-21
1741 [SHIN & KIM] Policy and Law Report_Vol.182 – 정부 주요 정책 및 입법정보 등에 관한 동향: 2023.4.12.~4.18. 2023-04-21
게시물 검색

사단법인 인하우스카운슬포럼 In-House Counsel Forum

주소 : 서울시 강남구 테헤란로 625, 17층 | 고유번호 : 107-82-14795| 대표자 : 박철영| 대표전화 : 02-6091-1998

E-mail : reps@ihcf.co.kr

Copyright(C) IHCF KOREA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

모바일 버전으로 보기