후원로펌 뉴스레터

본문 바로가기

HOME > 후원로펌 현황 > 후원로펌 뉴스레터

후원로펌 현황

[법무법인 광장] Greater Reforms for Promoting Work-Life Balance – Changes to the Gender Equal Employment and Work-Life Balance Support Act

페이지 정보

작성일19-10-22 17:45

본문


상단 이미지

Greater Reforms for Promoting Work-Life Balance – Changes to the Gender Equal Employment and Work-Life Balance Support Act

Starting 1 October 2019, employees would benefit from significant changes to the Gender Equal Employment and Work-Life Balance Support Act (“GEEA”), particularly concerning paternity leave and workhours reduction for childcare and family care. These changes are also expected to have material implications for employers with regard to general compliance obligations and require employers to review their practices in engaging employees and other workforce flexibility measures to adapt to the legislative changes. We have summarized the notable changes as follows.

 1. Expansion of Paternity Leave
CurrentEmployers are required to provide three (3) to five (5) of paternity leave, only the first three (3) days are paid.
 Employees must request for paternity leave within 30 days from the spouse’s childbirth.
Employees must use the paternity leave in a single segment.
AmendedEmployers are required to provide at least ten (10) days of paternity leave.  All ten (10) days are paid.
Employees must request for paternity leave within 90 days from the spouse’s childbirth.
Employees may use the paternity leave over two (2) segments.
 Effective: 1 October 2019
 These amendments would be inapplicable to (i) employees who had already begun his paternity leave before 1 October 2019, and (ii) employees whose right to request for paternity leave has expired (i.e., employees whose spouse have given birth before September 1, 2019). Qualifying employers may be eligible for government subsidy for the paternity leave benefit.
2. Expansion of Childcare Workhour Reduction
CurrentEmployees may be entitled to childcare leave and/or a workhours reduction in lieu of leave for up to one (1) year combined.
If an employee chooses workhours reduction instead of leave, his/her work hours may be reduced to fifteen (15) to thirty (30) hours per week.
AmendedEmployees are permitted to use up to one (1) year of childcare leave and up to a separate one (1) year of childcare workhour reduction.
Of the one (1) year available for childcare leave, if an employee chooses workhour reduction instead of leave during that 1-year, this period of workhour reduction shall be treated separately and be added to the 1-year workhour reduction entitlement under the amended GEEA.
If an employee chooses workhours reduction instead of leave, his/her work hours may be reduced to fifteen (15) to thirty-five (35) hours per day.
Effective: 1 October 2019
Under the amended GEEA, employees are entitled to up to one (1) year of childcare leave and another one (1) year of childcare workhour reduction for qualifying employees, providing two (2) years of childcare entitlement in total for working parents. Although the 1-year childcare leave period can be substituted with workhour reductions (for up to 2-years of reduced work hours), the 1-year workhour reduction period cannot be replaced with leave.
3. Expansion of Family Care Leave to include Family Care Day-Offs
CurrentEmployees with more than one (1) year of service may use up to ninety (90) days of unpaid family-care leave per annum.
Employees may request for unpaid family-care leave on the grounds of the family member’s illness, accident.
Employees may use the family-care leave over multiple segments so long as each segment is at least thirty (30) days.
AmendedEmployees are entitled to use up to ten (10) days (“Family Care Day-Offs”) of the total ninety (90) days of family-care as single day-off, as opposed to the minimum thirty (30) days’ segments.
“Childcare” is now a recognized ground for using the Family Care Day-Offs.
Effective: 1 January 2020
Prior to the amendment, the GEEA allowed Family Care Leave use in segments no shorter than thirty (30) days. However, the amended GEEA permits up to ten (10) days for use as single day-offs. With the ability to use up to ten (10) days as single day-offs, employees can benefit from family-care leave for emergencies such as a sick child or urgent parent-teacher conferences or other situations where 30 days is not required.
4. New Right to Request for Workhour Reduction
Under the amended law, employees will be entitled to the right to request for a workhour reduction on the enumerated grounds (e.g., family care, health, retirement preparation, or academic endeavor).
CurrentDid not exist
AmendedEmployees may request for workhour reduction for enumerated grounds (e.g., family care, health, retirement preparation, academic endeavor).
The employer must grant the request unless otherwise permitted to refuse under the law.
Employees’ work hours during the workhour reduction period would range from 15 to 30 hours per week.
The workhour reduction period can be up to three (3) years (1 year if the grounds for the request was to pursue academic endeavors). During this period, the employer may not unfairly change the employment terms, except for a proportionate reduction in benefits that are associated with work hours (e.g., salary).
Effective: 1 January 2020 (300 or more employees)
Effective: 1 January 2021 (30 to 299 employees)
Effective: 1 January 2022 (1 to 29 employees)
Potential Impact on Your Business
We strongly advise employers to review their existing practices and policies to ensure compliance with these latest amendments to the GEEA. We anticipate possible disruptions to the workplace due to the increased benefits – especially with regard to the securing adequate substitute personnel while the primary employees are on leave or under a reduced workhours period. Companies must, therefore, review their employee engagement practices to ensure proper temporary engagements as well as introduce workplace flexibility to ensure continued operations. Lee & Ko boasts a successful track record in addressing compliance issues upon legislative changes and offers versatile expertise in a wide array of HR compliance and associated matters. Should you need any assistance in this area of law, please do not hesitate to contact Lee & Ko.
─ CONTACT ─
Keum Nang PARK
Sang Hoon LEE
T:+82.2.772.4345
E:sanghoon.lee
@leeko.com
Profile>
Jung Hyun UHM
Chang Soo JIN
T:+82.2.6386.6290
E:changsoo.jin
@leeko.com
Profile>
Eunkyoung LYU
Hyunseok SONG
T:+82.2.772.4691
E:hyunseok.song
@leeko.com
Profile>
Eunkyoung LYU
William KIM
T:+82.2.772.5944
E:william.kim
@leeko.com
Profile>
For more information pertaining to this newsletter, please contact the attorneys identified on the right.
The Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter is provided for general information purposes only and should not be considered as the rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter service, please click here or reply to this email stating UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. The contects and opinions expressed in the Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter are protected by law against any unauthorized use.
후원로펌 뉴스레터 목록
번호 제목 날짜
2715 [법무법인(유한) 바른] 뉴스레터 - 제131호(2024.4) 2024-04-17
2714 [법무법인(유) 광장] Korean Tax Regulation Updates for 2024 2024-04-17
2713 [법무법인(유) 세종] 개인정보보호위원회, 「해외사업자의 개인정보 보호법 적용 안내서」 발간 2024-04-17
2712 [법무법인(유) 세종] Korean Consumer Goods & Retail Newsletter 2024_Vol.1 2024-04-17
2711 [법무법인(유) 세종] 세종Law Focus - Vol.231 (2024.04.08~04.14) 2024-04-17
2710 [법무법인(유) 세종] 민간사업자의 송전설비 설치에 대한 가처분 신청을 기각시킨 사례 2024-04-17
2709 [법무법인(유) 세종] Increased Dividend Potential for REITs in Korea 2024-04-17
2708 [법무법인(유) 세종] 코인 발행재단과 MM업체 간의 소송에서, 제1심에서 사실상 대부분 패소하였음에도 불구하고 항소심에서 코인 발행재단 측을 대리하여 양 측 청구를 포기하는 것으로 조정을 2024-04-17
2707 [법무법인(유) 세종] Special Report - 제22대 국회의원 선거: 그 결과와 영향 2024-04-17
2706 [법무법인(유) 세종] EU의 『역외보조금 규정』 운영 현황 및 시사점 2024-04-17
2705 [법무법인(유) 세종] Rating of Competition Compliance Program in Korea 2024-04-17
2704 [법무법인(유) 세종] 세종Law Focus - Vol.230 (2024.04.01~04.07) 2024-04-17
2703 [법무법인(유) 세종] 상장폐지절차 간소화 정책 및 업무사례 소개 2024-04-17
2702 [법무법인(유) 세종] 기업 밸류업 프로그램의 준비 – 3. 금융위, 기업밸류업·지배구조 우수기업 추가 인센티브 제도 및 상장기업 배당절차 개선현황 공개 2024-04-17
2701 [법무법인(유) 세종] 신탁형 집합투자기구의 집합투자업자 및 신탁업자에게 민법 제758조 제1항에 의한 공작물 점유자의 책임을 인정한 대법원 판결이 선고되었습니다 2024-04-17
게시물 검색

사단법인 인하우스카운슬포럼 In-House Counsel Forum

주소 : 서울시 강남구 테헤란로 625, 17층 | 고유번호 : 107-82-14795| 대표자 : 양재선

E-mail : reps@ihcf.co.kr

Copyright(C) IHCF KOREA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

모바일 버전으로 보기