후원로펌 뉴스레터

본문 바로가기

HOME > 후원로펌 현황 > 후원로펌 뉴스레터

후원로펌 현황

[법무법인 광장] Recent Decision by the Tax Tribunal Regarding Application of the Flat Tax Rate to Foreign Employee

페이지 정보

작성일20-03-11 11:41

본문


상단 이미지

Recent Decision by the Tax Tribunal
Regarding Application of the Flat Tax Rate to Foreign Employees

Application of the flat tax rate to “a foreign employee
who worked in Korea for a period which ended before January 1, 2014,
and recommenced working in Korea after January 1, 2014”

Lee & Ko recently obtained a favorable decision from the Tax Tribunal regarding a foreign employee who: (1) worked in Korea for a period of time which ended prior to January 1, 2014; and then (2) returned to Korea and started working in Korea again after January 1, 2014.
Facts
The facts in this appeal involved a foreign employee working in Korea between 2006 and 2007, and thereafter left Korea to work in a foreign country. After 2015, the foreign employee returned to Korea and started working in Korea again. During the years 2015 through 2017, the foreign employee filed income tax returns by applying the flat tax rate to his income. 
Relevant Tax Law
According to Article 18(2) of the Tax Preference Control Act (“TPCA”), a foreign employee is allowed to apply the flat tax rate to income from his or her labor for 5 years from the date the person first begins employment in Korea.
NTS’ Challenge and Tax Assessment
The National Tax Service (“NTS”) interpreted the meaning of ‘the date the person first provides labor in Korea’ literally and refused to apply the flat tax rate to the foreign employee who began to provide labor after January 1, 2014, because the foreign employee also provided labor in Korea before January 1, 2014. The NTS argued that in such case the five year period would have already expired, since the clock would start to run from the date the employee first began to provide labor in Korea, before January 1, 2014.

The NTS took the position that the flat tax rate is applicable only for the first five consecutive years from the date the person first began to provide labor in Korea (in this case, from FY 2006). Therefore, the NTS determined that the foreign employee was not eligible to apply the flat tax rate to his income for the 2015 to 2017 period. Consequently, additional income tax (in the form of applying the general progressive tax rates) was imposed as well as a penalty.
Lee & Ko’s Arguments
Lee & Ko argued that even in such a case the foreign employee should be entitled to the flat tax rate for five years from the date the employee begins to work again in Korea after January 1, 2014. Lee&Ko argued that the NTS interpreted the TPCA in such a way that they were retroactively applying the amended tax law to the period before the amendment. Thus, the NTS were violating the general principle prohibiting retroactive imposition of tax law. Lee & Ko also pointed out that such an interpretation of the law violated the general principle of fair taxation by causing unequal tax treatment among foreign employees, and also contravened the purpose of the law, which aims to provide special tax treatment for foreign employees.
Decision of the Tax Tribunal
The Tax Tribunal held that the flat tax rate applies to foreign employees in Korea for a period of five years, starting from the first date that they begin to provide labor in Korea after January 1, 2014 regardless of whether such foreign employee was previously employed in Korea in a period earlier than January 1, 2014.
Observation
Lee & Ko successfully persuaded the Tax Tribunal to agree with all of its arguments, and to cancel the additional taxes imposed on the taxpayer in full. In this regard, other foreign employees in similar circumstances are expected to be eligible for the cancellation of additional tax soon.

Foreign employees who were not able to apply the flat tax rate in the past due to the NTS interpretation can now claim refunds by filing amended income tax returns for the past five years.
─ CONTACT ─
Kwang Bae PARK
Jay SHIM
T: +82.2.2191.3235
E: jay.shim
@leeko.com
Profile >
Jongsoo (Jay) YOON
Ted Tae-Gyung KIM
T: +82.2.2191.3246
E: ted.kim
@leeko.com
Profile>
Yu Jin KIM
Sung Hyun RYU
T: +82.2.2191.3251
E: sunghyun.ryu
@leeko.com
Profile>
For more information pertaining to this newsletter, please contact the attorneys identified on the right.
The Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter is provided for general information purposes only and should not be considered as the rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter service, please click here or reply to this email stating UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. The contects and opinions expressed in the Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter are protected by law against any unauthorized use.
후원로펌 뉴스레터 목록
번호 제목 날짜
2616 [법무법인(유) 화우] EU 의회, AI 법 가결 2024-03-22
2615 [법무법인(유) 화우] 여유자금 투자 방법을 정한 자산유동화계획에 따르지 않고 체결된 계약이 사법상 무효임을 확인한 최초의 대법원 판결(대법원2023다259262) 2024-03-22
2614 [법무법인(유) 화우] 美 SEC, 기후공시 의무화 규정 확정 2024-03-22
2613 [법무법인(유) 화우] 상장사 M&A 제도개선을 위한 1 공시강화, 2 외부평가제도 개선, 3 합병가액 산정규제 개선 2024-03-22
2612 [법무법인(유한) 태평양] 근로자파견 관련 최신 대법원판결의 시사점 2024-03-21
2611 [법무법인(유한) 태평양] 코리아 디스카운트 해소를 위한 일반주주 이익 보호 제도개선 동향 2024-03-21
2610 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] Weekly_Legislative_Report_Week_of_March_11_to_March_15_2024 2024-03-21
2609 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 게임물의 확률형 아이템 확률정보공개의무 시행 관련 해설 2024-03-21
2608 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 공정거래 자율준수제도(CP) 법제화 관련 공정거래법 시행령 개정안 입법예고 및 CP 운영고시 제정안 행정예고 2024-03-21
2607 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 금융 이슈리포트 - 금융회사등의 해외진출규정의 주요 개정사항 및 시사점 2024-03-21
2606 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 주간입법동향_vol.156 2024-03-21
2605 [법무법인(유) 광장] M&A 제도개선을위한 「자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률 시행령」 및 「증권의발행및공시등에관한규정」 규정개정예고 2024-03-21
2604 [법무법인(유한) 바른] 뉴스레터 - 제130호(2024.3) 2024-03-20
2603 [법무법인(유) 화우] 도로 정보통신설비 유지관리 불법파견 항소심 첫 승소 (서울고등법원 2023나2014276, 2023나2010410) 2024-03-19
2602 [법무법인(유) 화우] 한-미 국방상호조달협정 체결에 앞서 2024-03-19
게시물 검색

사단법인 인하우스카운슬포럼 In-House Counsel Forum

주소 : 서울시 강남구 테헤란로 625, 17층 | 고유번호 : 107-82-14795| 대표자 : 박철영| 대표전화 : 02-6091-1998

E-mail : reps@ihcf.co.kr

Copyright(C) IHCF KOREA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

모바일 버전으로 보기