후원로펌 뉴스레터

본문 바로가기

HOME > 후원로펌 현황 > 후원로펌 뉴스레터

후원로펌 현황

[법무법인 광장] Recent Decision by the Tax Tribunal Regarding Application of the Flat Tax Rate to Foreign Employee

페이지 정보

작성일20-03-11 11:41

본문


상단 이미지

Recent Decision by the Tax Tribunal
Regarding Application of the Flat Tax Rate to Foreign Employees

Application of the flat tax rate to “a foreign employee
who worked in Korea for a period which ended before January 1, 2014,
and recommenced working in Korea after January 1, 2014”

Lee & Ko recently obtained a favorable decision from the Tax Tribunal regarding a foreign employee who: (1) worked in Korea for a period of time which ended prior to January 1, 2014; and then (2) returned to Korea and started working in Korea again after January 1, 2014.
Facts
The facts in this appeal involved a foreign employee working in Korea between 2006 and 2007, and thereafter left Korea to work in a foreign country. After 2015, the foreign employee returned to Korea and started working in Korea again. During the years 2015 through 2017, the foreign employee filed income tax returns by applying the flat tax rate to his income. 
Relevant Tax Law
According to Article 18(2) of the Tax Preference Control Act (“TPCA”), a foreign employee is allowed to apply the flat tax rate to income from his or her labor for 5 years from the date the person first begins employment in Korea.
NTS’ Challenge and Tax Assessment
The National Tax Service (“NTS”) interpreted the meaning of ‘the date the person first provides labor in Korea’ literally and refused to apply the flat tax rate to the foreign employee who began to provide labor after January 1, 2014, because the foreign employee also provided labor in Korea before January 1, 2014. The NTS argued that in such case the five year period would have already expired, since the clock would start to run from the date the employee first began to provide labor in Korea, before January 1, 2014.

The NTS took the position that the flat tax rate is applicable only for the first five consecutive years from the date the person first began to provide labor in Korea (in this case, from FY 2006). Therefore, the NTS determined that the foreign employee was not eligible to apply the flat tax rate to his income for the 2015 to 2017 period. Consequently, additional income tax (in the form of applying the general progressive tax rates) was imposed as well as a penalty.
Lee & Ko’s Arguments
Lee & Ko argued that even in such a case the foreign employee should be entitled to the flat tax rate for five years from the date the employee begins to work again in Korea after January 1, 2014. Lee&Ko argued that the NTS interpreted the TPCA in such a way that they were retroactively applying the amended tax law to the period before the amendment. Thus, the NTS were violating the general principle prohibiting retroactive imposition of tax law. Lee & Ko also pointed out that such an interpretation of the law violated the general principle of fair taxation by causing unequal tax treatment among foreign employees, and also contravened the purpose of the law, which aims to provide special tax treatment for foreign employees.
Decision of the Tax Tribunal
The Tax Tribunal held that the flat tax rate applies to foreign employees in Korea for a period of five years, starting from the first date that they begin to provide labor in Korea after January 1, 2014 regardless of whether such foreign employee was previously employed in Korea in a period earlier than January 1, 2014.
Observation
Lee & Ko successfully persuaded the Tax Tribunal to agree with all of its arguments, and to cancel the additional taxes imposed on the taxpayer in full. In this regard, other foreign employees in similar circumstances are expected to be eligible for the cancellation of additional tax soon.

Foreign employees who were not able to apply the flat tax rate in the past due to the NTS interpretation can now claim refunds by filing amended income tax returns for the past five years.
─ CONTACT ─
Kwang Bae PARK
Jay SHIM
T: +82.2.2191.3235
E: jay.shim
@leeko.com
Profile >
Jongsoo (Jay) YOON
Ted Tae-Gyung KIM
T: +82.2.2191.3246
E: ted.kim
@leeko.com
Profile>
Yu Jin KIM
Sung Hyun RYU
T: +82.2.2191.3251
E: sunghyun.ryu
@leeko.com
Profile>
For more information pertaining to this newsletter, please contact the attorneys identified on the right.
The Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter is provided for general information purposes only and should not be considered as the rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter service, please click here or reply to this email stating UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. The contects and opinions expressed in the Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter are protected by law against any unauthorized use.
후원로펌 뉴스레터 목록
번호 제목 날짜
2580 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 도심항공교통법령 관련 이슈리포트 - 도심항공교통법령의 시행 및 그 시사점 2024-03-14
2579 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] Weekly_Legislative_Report_Week_of_March_4_to_March_8_2024 2024-03-14
2578 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] ESG 본부 이슈리포트_Vol.57 2024-03-14
2577 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 금융 이슈리포트 - 전자금융감독규정 개정안의 주요내용 및 시사점 2024-03-14
2576 [법무법인(유) 광장] Amendment to Subcontracting Act 2024-03-13
2575 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] GCG 이슈리포트 국문 - 美 정부, 신규 대러 경제제재 발표 2024-03-11
2574 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 미래노사경영연구소 이슈리포트 - 직장 내 괴롭힘 조사·판단 시 외부기관 위탁의 필요 2024-03-11
2573 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 주간입법동향_vol.155 2024-03-11
2572 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] Weekly_Legislative_Report_Week_of_February_26_to_March_1_2024 2024-03-11
2571 [법무법인(유) 율촌] KFTC Proposes Statutory Amendments and Regulatory Guidelines for Voluntary Antitrust Compliance Program 2024-03-09
2570 [법무법인(유) 율촌] OECD 필라 1 Amount B 핵심 내용 및 시사점 2024-03-09
2569 [법무법인(유) 율촌] 베트남 법령 업데이트 2024-03-09
2568 [법무법인(유) 율촌] 유럽연합(EU)의 [탄소중립 산업법(Net-Zero Industry Act)] 최종안 합의 완료 2024-03-09
2567 [법무법인(유) 율촌] 공정거래 자율준수프로그램(CP) 관련 공정거래법 시행령 개정안 입법예고 및 CP 운영고시 제정안 행정예고 2024-03-09
2566 [법무법인(유) 율촌] 2024년 상반기 러시아 개정 법률 동향 첨부파일 2024-03-09
게시물 검색

사단법인 인하우스카운슬포럼 In-House Counsel Forum

주소 : 서울시 강남구 테헤란로 625, 17층 | 고유번호 : 107-82-14795| 대표자 : 양재선

E-mail : reps@ihcf.co.kr

Copyright(C) IHCF KOREA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

모바일 버전으로 보기