후원로펌 뉴스레터

본문 바로가기

HOME > 후원로펌 현황 > 후원로펌 뉴스레터

후원로펌 현황

[Lee&Ko Intellectual Property Group Newsletter] Lee & Ko Successfully Suspended Automatic Reduction of Innovator Drug Price

페이지 정보

작성일18-10-06 19:09

본문



상단 이미지

Lee & Ko Successfully Suspended Automatic Reduction of Innovator Drug Price, Despite Market Launch of Generic Drugs in Korea

  • Statutory Obligation to Reduce Innovator Drug Price

Under the Korean National Health Insurance Act (the “Act”) and related rules and regulations, even during the patent term of an innovator drug, in case the prices of potential generic drugs are registered with Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service(“HIRA”) by generic companies for eventual market launch, the innovator drug price is automatically and mandatorily reduced.  Such reduced innovator drug price can be recovered to its original price, only if there is a final judgment from the Korean Supreme Court, the highest appellate court in Korea, holding that the generic drugs infringe the innovator drug’s patent.

Therefore, the generic companies who do not respect the innovator drug’s patent term, but go ahead with their generic launch incur irreparable huge damage to the innovator company because of the automatic price reduction.  Moreover, such damage suffered by the innovator company grew bigger due to the recent amendment of the Act, which permitted larger reductions of the innovator drug price (53.55% of their original price).


  • Suspension of Automatic Price Reduction Through Administrative Proceedings

Against the backdrop of the above, Lee & Ko has successfully represented an innovator drug company, a multinational pharmaceutical company, in administrative proceedings to object and suspend the automatic drug price reduction.  Such suspension of automatic reduction was granted for the first time since the Act has been in effect for the past few decades.  Lee & Ko argued in the proceedings that: (i) registering potential generic drug price with MFDS is effectively an infringement of the innovator drug’s patent, and thus, should be considered illegal; (ii) mandatory reduction of the innovator drug price imposed on the innovator company based on such illegal act by the generic company is not fair and should not be permitted; and (iii) enforcement of such automatic price reduction incurs irreparable damage to the innovator company, and thus, the enforcement should be suspended.  It took only ten days from the administrative petition submitted for the suspension of automatic price reduction that Lee & Ko obtained a favorable decision from the administrative court on behalf of its client.

 

  • From Now, Unless Innovator Drug’s Patent Is Finally Invalidated, Irreparable Damage from the Automatic Price Reduction Can Be Prevented

In light of the favorable decision obtained by Lee & Ko above for the innovator drug company, unless innovator drug’s patent is finally invalidated in the Supreme Court, the innovator drug company may bring administrative proceedings at any time during the term of its patent to suspend the mandatory and automatic price reduction, which is triggered when generic companies prepare for their market launch and register their generic drug price with HIRA.

─ CONTACT ─
Keum Nang PARK
Keum Nang PARK
T:82.2.2191.3036
E:keumnang.park
@leeko.com
profile>
Jung Hyun UHM
Jung Hyun UHM
T:82.6386.6256
E:junghyun.uhm
@leeko.com
profile >

 

For more information pertaining to this newsletter, please contact the attorneys identified on the right.
The Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter is provided for general information purposes only and should not be considered as the considered as the rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter service, please click here or reply to this email stating UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. The contects and opinions expressed in the Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter are protected by law against any unauthorized use.


후원로펌 뉴스레터 목록
번호 제목 날짜
2804 [법무법인(유) 세종] 개인정보보호위원회, 「개인정보 처리방침 작성지침」 개정 새글 2024-05-17
2803 [법무법인(유) 세종] 정부 가이드라인에 따라 기존 업체와 위탁거래를 중단하고 그 업무를 자회사로 위탁한 것이 공정거래법상의 부당거절행위 등에 해당하지 않음을 인정받은 사례 새글 2024-05-17
2802 [법무법인(유) 세종] 미국 상무부의 알루미늄 압출재 덤핑‧보조금 조사 특징 및 시사점 새글 2024-05-17
2801 [법무법인(유) 세종] 후순위 대주의 공매절차중지가처분 신청을 성공적으로 방어한 사례 새글 2024-05-17
2800 [법무법인(유) 세종] 개인정보보호위원회, 전 분야 마이데이터 추진을 위한 「개인정보 보호법 시행령」 개정안 입법예고 새글 2024-05-17
2799 [법무법인(유) 세종] 세종Law Focus - Vol.235 (2024.05.07~05.12) 새글 2024-05-17
2798 [법무법인(유) 세종] 美 대통령, 對 러시아 · 이란 추가 제재를 포함한 국가안보패키지법률 서명 새글 2024-05-17
2797 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] ESG 본부 이슈리포트_Vol.58 2024-05-16
2796 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] AI 이슈리포트 - AI를 활용한 딥페이크 음란물 규제 2024-05-16
2795 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 금융자본시장대응 이슈리포트 2024-05-16
2794 [법무법인(유) 광장] 전 분야 마이데이터 추진을 위한 개인정보 보호법 시행령 개정안 입법예고 2024-05-16
2793 [법무법인(유한) 태평양] 중국 「국가안전기관 행정집행절차 규정」상 전자장치의 검사 등 관련 주요내용 및 시사점 2024-05-15
2792 [법무법인(유한) 태평양] 영국 「중재법(Arbitration Act)」의 주요 개정내용 및 시사점 2024-05-15
2791 [법무법인(유한) 태평양] 「게임산업 진흥 종합계획(2024~2028)」의 주요내용 및 시사점 2024-05-15
2790 [법무법인(유한) 태평양] 중대재해사건 동향: 내사종결 - 자동차부품 제조업체 기계 협착 사망사고 2024-05-15
게시물 검색

사단법인 인하우스카운슬포럼 In-House Counsel Forum

주소 : 서울시 강남구 테헤란로 625, 17층 | 고유번호 : 107-82-14795| 대표자 : 박철영| 대표전화 : 02-6091-1998

E-mail : reps@ihcf.co.kr

Copyright(C) IHCF KOREA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

모바일 버전으로 보기