후원로펌 뉴스레터

본문 바로가기
ENG
인하우스카운슬포럼

[법무법인 광장] Transition to a Negative Regulatory Framework for In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Medical Devices

페이지 정보

작성일18-11-27 16:06

본문


상단 이미지

Transition to a Negative Regulatory Framework 
for In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) Medical Devices

The 55th Policy meeting was held on October 31, 2018, presided by Prime Minister Nak-yeon Lee. This conference was attended by the heads of administrative agencies, such as the Ministry of Health and Welfare(MHW) and the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety(MFDS), to discuss and confirm the 「Comprehensive Negative Regulatory Transition Performance Results and Future Plans」.


1. Comprehensive Negative Regulatory Transition

The comprehensive negative regulatory transition is a transition into a ‘approve first – regulate later’ system for new businesses by changing the existing positive method of regulation, which requires that new technology must either comply with regulations that already exist (which are not compatible with the new technology) or wait for the government to devise rules that specifically allow that new technology.  Under the negative regulatory framework, the new technology can enter the market with relevant changes in regulations to follow, as necessary.  By drastically reducing the time it takes for new technology to enter the market, the reform hopes to strengthen emerging business sectors that are driving the 4th industrial revolution.


2. Regulatory Innovation in the Field of Medical Devices

The medical device sector is the main target industry of the comprehensive negative regulatory transition. On July 19, 2018, the relevant government agencies made a joint announcement on Regulatory Innovation in the Medical Device Industry and Measures to Promote Industry Development for Innovative Growth and Expansion」.

Among the key stated objectives of the regulatory innovation in the medical device industry is the Introduction of Comprehensive Negative Regulation for Safe Medical Devices.” And with respect to IVD medical devices, the plan is to (1) switch the evaluation of new medical technology from pre-market evaluation to post -market evaluation, and (2) exempt the approval requirement for changes except for those that are significant.


3. Comprehensive Negative Regulatory Transition for IVD Medical Devices

(1)Post-Market Evaluation of New Medical Technology

Starting from January of 2019, the MHW will first begin by exempting the pre-market evaluation process for infectious disease IVD medical devices. The MHW has announced that it plans to eventually extend the exemption to all IVD medical devices.

(2)Exemption of Approval for Change except for Significant Changes

The MFDS has announced its plan to exempt the approval requirement for changes for IVD medical devices, except for those that involve significant changes.

According to the current 「Regulations on Medical Device Approval, Notification, and Review」 (MFDS Notification No. 2018-59), the 140 items in 10 different categories listed under [Attachment 3] ‘Minor Changes’ are exempt from approval requirement for changes.

However, the MFDS plans to amend Regulations on Medical Device Approval, Notification, and Review」 so that, beginning February of 2019, (i) the approval requirement for all changes that are not significant will be exempted, and (ii) manufacturers and importers only have to report to the MFDS after-the-fact for such non-significant changes.

As a result of these amendments, it is expected that manufacturers and importers of IVD medical devices will be able to enjoy a cut-back of 2 or more months in the change approval process as well as a significant reduction in fees for change approval.

─ CONTACT ─
변호사 이형근
Hyeong Gun LEE
T:82.2.772.4379
E:hyeonggun.lee
@leeko.com
profile>
Keum Nang PARK
Keum Nang PARK
T:82.2.2191.3036
E:keumnang.park
@leeko.com
profile>
변호사 신재영
Eileen Jaiyoung SHIN
T:82.2.772.4831
E:eileen.shin
@leeko.com
profile>

 

For more information pertaining to this newsletter, please contact the attorneys identified on the right.
The Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter is provided for general information purposes only and should not be considered as the considered as the rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter service, please click here or reply to this email stating UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. The contects and opinions expressed in the Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter are protected by law against any unauthorized use.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

제목
[법무법인(유한) 태평양] 유류분 제도에 대한 위헌 및 헌법불합치 결정의 내용 및 시사점
[법무법인(유한) 태평양] 정년보장형 임금피크제의 유효성을 확인한 판결
[법무법인(유) 화우] 의료기기 허가심사과정 상 사이버보안 적용
[법무법인(유) 화우] 헌법재판소, 상속 유류분 제도 위헌 결정
[법무법인(유) 화우] 미국 FTC의 인공지능 학습데이터에 관한 규제 동향
[법무법인(유) 광장] Landmark Ruling: Supreme Court Overturns PIPC Sanctions Against E-commerce Platform Ope…
[법무법인(유) 세종] 상장차익에 대한 증여세 부과처분과 관련하여 신뢰보호원칙, 정당한 사유 등을 주장하여 가산세 및 경정청구기한이 도과한 기납부 증여세를 환급받은 사례
[법무법인(유) 세종] 공공재정 부정수익자 제재 강화 등을 위한 공공재정환수법 개정안 시행
[법무법인(유) 세종] 공기업이 ‘발주자의 승인없이 하도급을 하였다’는 이유로 입찰참가자격제한 처분을 사전통지한 사안에서, 소송 절차를 거치지 않고 입찰참가자격제한 처분을 방어한 …
[법무법인(유) 세종] 세종Law Focus - Vol.233 (2024.04.22~04.28)
[법무법인(유) 세종] 월간 노동 뉴스레터
[법무법인(유) 세종] 유류분 제도에 대한 일부 위헌 및 헌법불합치 결정의 시사점 및 대응방안
[법무법인(유) 세종] 산업기술보호법 개정안의 내용과 그 의미
[법무법인(유) 세종] 결정형 발명의 진보성 인정 기준을 완화하는 최근의 대법원 판결 흐름을 뒤엎고 미라베그론 결정형 발명의 진보성이 부정된다는 판단을 이끌어낸 사례
[법무법인(유) 세종] 미 대선 “트럼프 재집권”시 우리 기업의 미국 비지니스에 미칠 영향: 對 미국 전기차/배터리 투자 및 무역 정책을 중심으로
게시물 검색

(사)인하우스카운슬포럼 In-House Counsel Forum

주소 : 서울시 강남구 테헤란로 625, 17층

고유번호 : 107-82-14795 | 대표자 : 박철영

대표번호 : 02-6091-1998

E-mail : reps@ihcf.co.kr

Copyright(C) IHCF KOREA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

PC 버전으로 보기