후원로펌 뉴스레터

본문 바로가기
ENG
인하우스카운슬포럼

[법무법인 광장] Key Changes to Korean Labor Standards Act in 2019

페이지 정보

작성일19-01-25 22:50

본문



상단 이미지

Key Changes to Korean Labor Standards Act in 2019


In 2018, Korea experienced major reforms to the employment laws including, but not limited to, the Labor Standards Act.  For example, many employers scrambled – many are still struggling – to adjust their work hour structures to comply with the new 52-hour work hour limit.  In 2019, legislative reforms and amendments proposed in 2018 have taken effect.  For your information, we have highlighted two major changes in the employment law landscape for 2019.


1.

Duty to Prevent Workplace Harassment

 


Employers will be required to prevent workplace harassment (effective July 1, 2019) where “workplace harassment” is defined as acts inflicting physical/mental distress to or creating a hostile work environment for co-workers unreasonably through use (or abuse) or one’s position/relationship in the workplace.

Before the AmendmentAfter the Amendment
No provision
on the duty to
prevent workplace
harassment
Duty to Investigate. Employers are required to investigate promptly upon learning of or receiving a complaint on workplace harassment.
Duty to Take Protective Measures. During the investigation, employers must take appropriate protective measures (e.g., work location change, mandatory paid leave) to protect victims (both alleged and actual) of workplace harassment.
Duty to Take Remedial Measures. Upon confirming the allegations of workplace harassment, employers are required to take remedial measures (e.g., work location change, job reassignment) upon request by the workplace harassing victim.
Duty to Take Disciplinary Measures. Upon confirming the allegations of workplace harassment, employers are required to take necessary disciplinary measures against the alleged perpetrator(s). Furthermore, employers are required to hear the victim’s opinion before undertaking any disciplinary measure.
The prohibition against Secondary Harm. Employers may not inflict any unfair disadvantages against the victim or complainant of workplace harassment in connection with the incident.
Effective: July 16, 2019

Notably, the amended Labor Standards Act mandates employers to develop and incorporate their anti-bullying policy terms into their rules of employment (“ROE”) as well as the types of measures to be taken upon occurrence of workplace harassment.  In the wake of the additional compliance requirement, employers are strongly advised to review and update their ROEs and file the amended ROEs with the Ministry of Employment and Labor by no later than July 16, 2019, when the new law takes effect.  Please note that the amended standard applies to acts of workplace harassment that occurs after the effective date of the amendment.


2.

Uniform Standard for Termination Notice Exemptions

 


The Labor Standards Act provides statutory exemptions from the termination notice requirement (i.e., thirty (30) days’ notice or payment in lieu thereof) under limited circumstances.  Before the amendment, the statutory exemptions varied depending on the forms of employment and the duration of employment (see “Before Amendments” below).  Under the amended Labor Standards Act, the law applies a uniform standard.  Please note that the amended standard applies to employment contracts executed after January 15, 2019.


Before the AmendmentAfter the Amendment
The termination notice requirement shall not apply to the following employees:Employers may be exempt from the termination notice requirement where:
1.Daily-hire employees with less than three (3) months of service time1.The employee’s continuous service time is less than three (3) months;
2.Fixed-term employees with less than two (2) months of employment term  
3.Monthly wage employees with less than six (6) months of service time (Note: Declared unconstitutional in December 2015)  
4.Employees hired for seasonal work with employment term of less than six (6) months  
5.Employees on a probationary period.  
Effective: January 15, 2019


If you have any questions on the amendments identified above, including how they may impact your business, please do not hesitate to contact Lee & Ko.

─ CONTACT ─
Kwang Bae Park
Sang Hoon LEE
T: 82.2.772.4345
E:sanghoon.lee @leeko.com
Profile>
Hwan Kyoung Ko
Chang Soo JIN
T: 82.2.6386.6290
E:changsoo.jin
@leeko.com
Profile>
Hwan Kyoung Ko
Hyunseok SONG
T: 82.2.772.4691
E:hyunseok.song @leeko.com
Profile>
Hwan Kyoung Ko
William KIM
T: 82.2.772.5944
E:william.kim
@leeko.com
Profile>

 

 

For more information pertaining to this newsletter, please contact the attorneys identified on the right.
The Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter is provided for general information purposes only and should not be considered as the considered as the rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter service, please click here or reply to this email stating UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. The contects and opinions expressed in the Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter are protected by law against any unauthorized use.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

제목
[법무법인(유) 광장] Landmark Ruling: Supreme Court Overturns PIPC Sanctions Against E-commerce Platform Ope…
[법무법인(유) 세종] 상장차익에 대한 증여세 부과처분과 관련하여 신뢰보호원칙, 정당한 사유 등을 주장하여 가산세 및 경정청구기한이 도과한 기납부 증여세를 환급받은 사례
[법무법인(유) 세종] 공공재정 부정수익자 제재 강화 등을 위한 공공재정환수법 개정안 시행
[법무법인(유) 세종] 공기업이 ‘발주자의 승인없이 하도급을 하였다’는 이유로 입찰참가자격제한 처분을 사전통지한 사안에서, 소송 절차를 거치지 않고 입찰참가자격제한 처분을 방어한 …
[법무법인(유) 세종] 세종Law Focus - Vol.233 (2024.04.22~04.28)
[법무법인(유) 세종] 월간 노동 뉴스레터
[법무법인(유) 세종] 유류분 제도에 대한 일부 위헌 및 헌법불합치 결정의 시사점 및 대응방안
[법무법인(유) 세종] 산업기술보호법 개정안의 내용과 그 의미
[법무법인(유) 세종] 결정형 발명의 진보성 인정 기준을 완화하는 최근의 대법원 판결 흐름을 뒤엎고 미라베그론 결정형 발명의 진보성이 부정된다는 판단을 이끌어낸 사례
[법무법인(유) 세종] 미 대선 “트럼프 재집권”시 우리 기업의 미국 비지니스에 미칠 영향: 對 미국 전기차/배터리 투자 및 무역 정책을 중심으로
[법무법인(유) 세종] 세종Law Focus - Vol.232 (2024.04.15~04.21)
[법무법인(유) 세종] 집중투표제 배제규정을 두지 않은 회사에서 2대 주주의 이사 선임에 관한 임시주주총회 소집청구를 선행안건 상정 방안으로 막아낸 사례
[법무법인(유) 세종] Exploring the Local Agent Designation System: Impact and Implications
[법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 중대재해처벌법 이슈리포트 - 자동차 부품업체 대표 24. 4. 4. 중대재해처벌법 위반 혐의로 최고형 …
[법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] Monthly Legal Update_4월호(2024)
게시물 검색

(사)인하우스카운슬포럼 In-House Counsel Forum

주소 : 서울시 강남구 테헤란로 625, 17층

고유번호 : 107-82-14795 | 대표자 : 박철영

대표번호 : 02-6091-1998

E-mail : reps@ihcf.co.kr

Copyright(C) IHCF KOREA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

PC 버전으로 보기