후원로펌 뉴스레터

본문 바로가기

HOME > 후원로펌 현황 > 후원로펌 뉴스레터

후원로펌 현황

[법무법인 광장] Korea strengthens protection of national core technology and industrial technology (Amendment of the Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology Act)

페이지 정보

작성일19-10-26 14:01

본문


상단 이미지
Korea strengthens protection of national core technology and industrial technology (Amendment of the Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology Act)

On August 20, 2019, an amendment of the Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology Act (hereinafter “PITA”) was passed and shall come into effect on February 21, 2020. The new amendment is likely to affect technology companies as the scope of national core technology and industrial technology under PITA is broadly defined by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE).

In particular, the amended PITA strengthens regulations that apply to companies in possession of national core technology and involve certain procedural requirements to ensure the protection of national core technology. The key points of the new amendment are outlined below.


1.

Prior approval and notification required for foreign investment activity

 

Under the current law (before the amendment takes effect), any entity that possesses national core technology developed with R&D funding from the government must report to MOTIE prior to landing foreign investments, such as in transactions where a foreign person or entity intends to own 50% or more of its shares.

The amended PITA requires an entity to report foreign investment to MOTIE in advance even if the national core technology it possesses was developed on its own and not with government funding. As for entities that do receive government funding to develop its national core technology, they must now receive prior approval from MOTIE for foreign investment activities, rather than providing advance notice.

If MOTIE determines that a national core technology leak could seriously affect national security, it may order suspension, prohibition, or reinstatement measures against foreign investments.

Therefore, if a company desires to invest in a Korean technology company, it would be necessary for the investing company to (i) confirm whether the Korean company possesses national core technology, and (ii) be prepared (e.g., set out contract conditions) for any legal problems that may arise if suspension or other measures are ordered by MOTIE.


2.

Heavier punishment to be imposed for technology leaks

 

Anyone who divulges national core technology to foreign countries is subject to imprisonment of up to 15 years or a fine of up to KRW 1.5 billion. However, since the current penalty does not have a minimum sentence or fine, in many cases, the actual penalty imposed on the offender is rather weak. In order to address this issue, the amendment will impose a mandatory sentence of a minimum of 3 years imprisonment and a fine of up to KRW 1.5 billion on offenders.

In other words, if national core technology is brought into a company by an employee who formerly worked at another company who owns the national core technology, it is likely that the company with the leaked technology will be subject to penalty in Korea. Therefore, it is important to take care to prevent the inflow of national core technology from other companies.


3.

Treble damages may be imposed for divulging and infringing industrial technology

 

The current law does not set out any provision on the amount of damages for damages caused by acts of infringement and divulgence of industrial technology. Thus, by principle, the infringer is only liable for actual damages.

However, the new amendment allows for the court to impose punitive damages not to exceed three times the amount of damages recognized as a result of intentional infringement of industrial technology, taking into consideration factors such as the strength of infringer’s position, willfulness, and the degree to which the infringer was aware of the risk of harm.

This regulation to strengthen damages also took effect in July 9, 2019 through the revision of the Patent Act and the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act.

As a result, since treble damages may be imposed for infringement of technology, regardless of the type of technology, it is particularly important that companies pay attention to compliance and make sure that newly recruited employees who previously worked in other companies are not negligently bringing in materials from their former companies so as to cause their new employer to be associated with infringement activities.

Lee & Ko’s IP Practice Group is not only experienced in corporate compliance matters, but having represented the largest patent infringement cases and trade secret infringement cases in Korea, it has accumulated the skills and know-how in technology related litigation and providing counsel for technology related legal risks. If you would like more information on our services, please contact the attorneys listed on the right.
─ CONTACT ─
Un Ho KIM
Un Ho KIM
T:+82.2.772.4695
E:unho.kim
@leeko.com
Profile>
Vera Eun Woo LEE
Sun CHANG
T:+82.2.772.4378
E:sun.chang
@leeko.com
Profile>
Vera Eun Woo LEE
Tae H. KIM
T:+82.2.6386.6656
E:taehyung.kim
@leeko.com
Profile>
For more information pertaining to this newsletter, please contact the attorneys identified on the right.
The Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter is provided for general information purposes only and should not be considered as the rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter service, please click here or reply to this email stating UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. The contects and opinions expressed in the Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter are protected by law against any unauthorized use.
후원로펌 뉴스레터 목록
번호 제목 날짜
2759 [법무법인(유) 세종] 상장차익에 대한 증여세 부과처분과 관련하여 신뢰보호원칙, 정당한 사유 등을 주장하여 가산세 및 경정청구기한이 도과한 기납부 증여세를 환급받은 사례 2024-05-02
2758 [법무법인(유) 세종] 공공재정 부정수익자 제재 강화 등을 위한 공공재정환수법 개정안 시행 2024-05-02
2757 [법무법인(유) 세종] 공기업이 ‘발주자의 승인없이 하도급을 하였다’는 이유로 입찰참가자격제한 처분을 사전통지한 사안에서, 소송 절차를 거치지 않고 입찰참가자격제한 처분을 방어한 사 2024-05-02
2756 [법무법인(유) 세종] 세종Law Focus - Vol.233 (2024.04.22~04.28) 2024-05-02
2755 [법무법인(유) 세종] 월간 노동 뉴스레터 2024-05-02
2754 [법무법인(유) 세종] 유류분 제도에 대한 일부 위헌 및 헌법불합치 결정의 시사점 및 대응방안 2024-05-02
2753 [법무법인(유) 세종] 산업기술보호법 개정안의 내용과 그 의미 2024-05-02
2752 [법무법인(유) 세종] 결정형 발명의 진보성 인정 기준을 완화하는 최근의 대법원 판결 흐름을 뒤엎고 미라베그론 결정형 발명의 진보성이 부정된다는 판단을 이끌어낸 사례 2024-05-02
2751 [법무법인(유) 세종] 미 대선 “트럼프 재집권”시 우리 기업의 미국 비지니스에 미칠 영향: 對 미국 전기차/배터리 투자 및 무역 정책을 중심으로 2024-05-02
2750 [법무법인(유) 세종] 세종Law Focus - Vol.232 (2024.04.15~04.21) 2024-05-02
2749 [법무법인(유) 세종] 집중투표제 배제규정을 두지 않은 회사에서 2대 주주의 이사 선임에 관한 임시주주총회 소집청구를 선행안건 상정 방안으로 막아낸 사례 2024-05-02
2748 [법무법인(유) 세종] Exploring the Local Agent Designation System: Impact and Implications 2024-05-02
2747 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 중대재해처벌법 이슈리포트 - 자동차 부품업체 대표 24. 4. 4. 중대재해처벌법 위반 혐의로 최고형 선고 2024-05-02
2746 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] Monthly Legal Update_4월호(2024) 2024-05-02
2745 [법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] Weekly_Legislative_Report_Week_of_April_15_to_April_19_2024 2024-05-02
게시물 검색

사단법인 인하우스카운슬포럼 In-House Counsel Forum

주소 : 서울시 강남구 테헤란로 625, 17층 | 고유번호 : 107-82-14795| 대표자 : 박철영| 대표전화 : 02-6091-1998

E-mail : reps@ihcf.co.kr

Copyright(C) IHCF KOREA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

모바일 버전으로 보기