후원로펌 뉴스레터

본문 바로가기
ENG
인하우스카운슬포럼

[법무법인 광장] Korea strengthens protection of national core technology and industrial technology (Amendment of the Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology Act)

페이지 정보

작성일19-10-26 14:01

본문


상단 이미지
Korea strengthens protection of national core technology and industrial technology (Amendment of the Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology Act)

On August 20, 2019, an amendment of the Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology Act (hereinafter “PITA”) was passed and shall come into effect on February 21, 2020. The new amendment is likely to affect technology companies as the scope of national core technology and industrial technology under PITA is broadly defined by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE).

In particular, the amended PITA strengthens regulations that apply to companies in possession of national core technology and involve certain procedural requirements to ensure the protection of national core technology. The key points of the new amendment are outlined below.


1.

Prior approval and notification required for foreign investment activity

 

Under the current law (before the amendment takes effect), any entity that possesses national core technology developed with R&D funding from the government must report to MOTIE prior to landing foreign investments, such as in transactions where a foreign person or entity intends to own 50% or more of its shares.

The amended PITA requires an entity to report foreign investment to MOTIE in advance even if the national core technology it possesses was developed on its own and not with government funding. As for entities that do receive government funding to develop its national core technology, they must now receive prior approval from MOTIE for foreign investment activities, rather than providing advance notice.

If MOTIE determines that a national core technology leak could seriously affect national security, it may order suspension, prohibition, or reinstatement measures against foreign investments.

Therefore, if a company desires to invest in a Korean technology company, it would be necessary for the investing company to (i) confirm whether the Korean company possesses national core technology, and (ii) be prepared (e.g., set out contract conditions) for any legal problems that may arise if suspension or other measures are ordered by MOTIE.


2.

Heavier punishment to be imposed for technology leaks

 

Anyone who divulges national core technology to foreign countries is subject to imprisonment of up to 15 years or a fine of up to KRW 1.5 billion. However, since the current penalty does not have a minimum sentence or fine, in many cases, the actual penalty imposed on the offender is rather weak. In order to address this issue, the amendment will impose a mandatory sentence of a minimum of 3 years imprisonment and a fine of up to KRW 1.5 billion on offenders.

In other words, if national core technology is brought into a company by an employee who formerly worked at another company who owns the national core technology, it is likely that the company with the leaked technology will be subject to penalty in Korea. Therefore, it is important to take care to prevent the inflow of national core technology from other companies.


3.

Treble damages may be imposed for divulging and infringing industrial technology

 

The current law does not set out any provision on the amount of damages for damages caused by acts of infringement and divulgence of industrial technology. Thus, by principle, the infringer is only liable for actual damages.

However, the new amendment allows for the court to impose punitive damages not to exceed three times the amount of damages recognized as a result of intentional infringement of industrial technology, taking into consideration factors such as the strength of infringer’s position, willfulness, and the degree to which the infringer was aware of the risk of harm.

This regulation to strengthen damages also took effect in July 9, 2019 through the revision of the Patent Act and the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act.

As a result, since treble damages may be imposed for infringement of technology, regardless of the type of technology, it is particularly important that companies pay attention to compliance and make sure that newly recruited employees who previously worked in other companies are not negligently bringing in materials from their former companies so as to cause their new employer to be associated with infringement activities.

Lee & Ko’s IP Practice Group is not only experienced in corporate compliance matters, but having represented the largest patent infringement cases and trade secret infringement cases in Korea, it has accumulated the skills and know-how in technology related litigation and providing counsel for technology related legal risks. If you would like more information on our services, please contact the attorneys listed on the right.
─ CONTACT ─
Un Ho KIM
Un Ho KIM
T:+82.2.772.4695
E:unho.kim
@leeko.com
Profile>
Vera Eun Woo LEE
Sun CHANG
T:+82.2.772.4378
E:sun.chang
@leeko.com
Profile>
Vera Eun Woo LEE
Tae H. KIM
T:+82.2.6386.6656
E:taehyung.kim
@leeko.com
Profile>
For more information pertaining to this newsletter, please contact the attorneys identified on the right.
The Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter is provided for general information purposes only and should not be considered as the rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter service, please click here or reply to this email stating UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. The contects and opinions expressed in the Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter are protected by law against any unauthorized use.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

제목
[법무법인(유) 광장] EU 공급망 실사지침(EU CSDDD) 관련 최근 입법 동향
[법무법인(유한) 태평양] 공급망 실사지침의 EU 이사회 통과
[법무법인(유한) 태평양] 보건복지부, ‘지출보고서’ 공개 운영 지침 발표 및 시사점
[법무법인(유) 율촌] 돌관공사비 클레임 프로세스 및 준비사항
[법무법인(유) 율촌] 對미국 에너지, 친환경 전기차 산업 투자 관련 대선 리스크 관리 전략
[법무법인(유) 율촌][율촌 입법 위클리 2024-09호] 22대 총선 주요 정당 정책 비교 등 첨부파일
[법무법인(유) 화우] 개인정보보호, 24년 주요이슈 분석
[법무법인(유) 화우] 게임유저 소송특례 게임산업법 개정안 발의
[법무법인(유) 화우] EU 의회, AI 법 가결
[법무법인(유) 화우] 여유자금 투자 방법을 정한 자산유동화계획에 따르지 않고 체결된 계약이 사법상 무효임을 확인한 최초의 대법원 판결(대법원2023다259262)
[법무법인(유) 화우] 美 SEC, 기후공시 의무화 규정 확정
[법무법인(유) 화우] 상장사 M&A 제도개선을 위한 1 공시강화, 2 외부평가제도 개선, 3 합병가액 산정규제 개선
[법무법인(유한) 태평양] 근로자파견 관련 최신 대법원판결의 시사점
[법무법인(유한) 태평양] 코리아 디스카운트 해소를 위한 일반주주 이익 보호 제도개선 동향
[법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] Weekly_Legislative_Report_Week_of_March_11_to_March_15_2024
게시물 검색

(사)인하우스카운슬포럼 In-House Counsel Forum

주소 : 서울시 강남구 테헤란로 625, 17층

고유번호 : 107-82-14795 | 대표자 : 박철영

대표번호 : 02-6091-1998

E-mail : reps@ihcf.co.kr

Copyright(C) IHCF KOREA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

PC 버전으로 보기