후원로펌 뉴스레터

본문 바로가기
ENG
인하우스카운슬포럼

[법무법인 광장] Implementation of Pre-approval System for Cross-border M&A for Companies with National Core Technology

페이지 정보

작성일20-02-24 17:41

본문


상단 이미지

Implementation of Pre-approval System for Cross-border M&A
for Companies with National Core Technology

The Act on Prevention of Divulgence and Protection of Industrial Technology (the “Act”) provides for the protection of national core technologies held by Korean companies, research institutes, professional institutions and universities (each a “Protected Entity”) and prevention of their leakage. The Act was revised as of February 21, 2020 and the revised Act was went into effect on the same day. The revised Act introduces hurdles for any foreign investor seeking to obtain control over a Protected Entity (whether through a direct investment, merger or joint venture) (“Triggering Transaction”) by introducing new pre-approval and pre-notification requirements. For a Protected Entity that holds any national core technology developed with national R&D funding, the pre-approval requirement applies, which in principle prohibits any Triggering Transaction and provides for limited exceptions. For a Protected Entity that holds any national core technology developed without national R&D funding, the pre-notification requirement applies, which in principle allows any Triggering Transaction with exceptional cases for blocking it. Any foreign investor or company seeking to obtain control over a Korean company with a strong technology portfolio would need to diligence on whether any such technology is classified as a national core technology and, if so, whether it was developed with national R&D funding and assess whether any exception may be applicable.
[Summary of Revisions]

Type

Old Scheme

New Scheme

Korean entity with national core technology with government R&D funding

Agreeing to
Triggering
Transaction

Pre-reporting
(allowed in principle and exceptions for blocking)

Pre-approval
(prohibited in principle and exceptions for allowing)
 

Becoming aware of
Triggering
Transaction
Report without delayReport without delay
Korean entity with national core technology without government R&D fundingAgreeing to
Triggering
Transaction

X

Pre-reporting
(allowed in principle and exceptions for blocking) 

Becoming aware of
Triggering
Transaction
XReport without delay
1.Introduction of Pre-approval Scheme
 The old Act required a Protected Entity to report to the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (the “MOTIE”) if it has developed a national core technology with government R&D funding and wish to carry out a Triggering Transaction. In such case, if it is determined that there is a material threat to national security from such national core technology being divulged, the MOTIE is authorized under the Act to suspend, prohibit or unwind the Triggering Transaction. Hence, the old scheme allowed Triggering Transactions in principle except in limited circumstances concerning national security.

Starting February 21, 2020, the revised Act requires a Protected Entity with a national core technology with government R&D funding to obtain an approval from the MOTIE prior to proceeding with any Triggering Transaction. This new scheme provides that a Triggering Transaction in such case is in principle prohibited and will be permitted in exceptional cases (see Article 11-2(1) of the new Act and Article 18-3 of the new Act’s Enforcement Decree). In addition, when approving a Triggering Transaction, the MOTIE is authorized to impose condition(s) as it deems necessary (see Article 11-2(4) of the new Act).

2.Expansion of Protected Entities
 The new Act has broadened the scope of Protected Entities to include those with national core technology developed without government R&D funding. Such Protected Entities are required to report any Triggering Transaction to MOTIE prior to completing such Triggering Transaction. If it is determined there is a material threat to national security from such national core technology being divulged, MOTIE is authorized under the Act to suspend, prohibit or unwind the Triggering Transaction (see Article 11-2(5) of the new Act and Article 18-5(3) of the new Act’s Enforcement Decree).
3.Reporting Duty on Protected Entities for Unsolicited Triggering Transaction
 If an unsolicited Triggering Transaction comes from a foreign investor or company, the Protected Entity is required to report such Triggering Transaction to MOTIE upon becoming aware of it. This duty used to apply only to Protected Entities with national core technology with government R&D funding but is now expanded to Protected Entities with national core technology without government R&D funding (see Article 11-2(6) of the new Act and Article 18-5(2) of the new Act’s Enforcement Decree).
4.Penalty for Violation
 The new Act imposes a criminal penalty of imprisonment up to 15 years or fine up to KRW 1.5 billion in the event (i) a Triggering Transaction is completed for the purpose of using national core technology abroad without pre-reporting or pre-approval or (ii) a pre-reporting was made or a pre-approval was obtained through improper means (see Articles 36(2), 14(6) and 14(6-2) of the new Act).
5.Implications
 The new Act strengthens the protection of national core technologies. If a foreign investor or company is seeking to obtain control over a Korean company with a strong technology portfolio, it would need to diligence on whether any such technology is classified as a national core technology and, if so, whether it was developed with national R&D funding and assess whether any exception may be applicable. In addition, pre-completion covenants and conditions precedent in a definitive agreement may need to address this issue to minimize execution risk.
─ CONTACT ─
Un Ho KIM
Sung Min KIM
T: +82.2.772.4979
E: sungmin.kim
@leeko.com
Profile>
Vera Eun Woo LEE
Bryan SHIN
T: +82.2.772.4761
E: bryan.shin
@leeko.com
Profile>
Vera Eun Woo LEE
Ha Yan BANG
T: +82.2.772.4902
E: hayan.bang
@leeko.com
Profile>
 
For more information pertaining to this newsletter, please contact the attorneys identified on the right.
The Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter is provided for general information purposes only and should not be considered as the rendering of legal advice for any specific matter. If you no longer wish to receive our newsletter service, please click here or reply to this email stating UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line. The contects and opinions expressed in the Lee&Ko Legal Newsletter are protected by law against any unauthorized use.

댓글목록

등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

제목
[법무법인(유) 광장] [광장 국제통상연구원] 세계지역동향 분석포럼 인도네시아편: 인도네시아의 비즈니스 환경과 진출전략
[법무법인(유) 율촌] 율촌 부동산 건설 부문 - 부동산 건설 부문 법령 & 정책 Update
[법무법인(유) 율촌] 「전자상거래법」 일부개정법률안 입법예고
[법무법인(유한) 태평양] 「2024년 회계심사·감리업무 운영계획」 발표
[법무법인(유한) 태평양] 정년연장형 임금피크제의 유효성 확인
[법무법인(유한) 태평양] 감사 선임 관련 선결의안 상정의 적법성을 인정한 법원 결정
[법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 해외규제 리포트 - 미 정부, 대 러시아 재제/수출통제 강화를 위한 미국 수출관리규정(EAR) 개정
[법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 주간입법동향_vol.159
[법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] 중국 이슈리포트 - 중국 국가기밀보호법 개정 및 다국적 기업의 컴플라이언스 관리
[법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] M&A 및 기업자문팀 이슈리포트 - M&A 제도개선을 위한 자본시장법 시행령 및 발행 및 공시규정 개정안 입법예고의 주요 내용과 시사점
[법무법인(유) 화우] 그린워싱 EU 규제 동향 및 사례
[법무법인(유) 화우] 개정 세법 시행규칙 주요내용 소개
[법무법인(유) 화우] 자연자본 공시 지침 주요 내용 및 최신 동향
[법무법인(유) 광장] 『광장 국제통상연구원』 Issue Brief Vol.2, 2024 첨부파일
[법무법인(유한) 대륙아주] Weekly_Legislative_Report_Week_of_March_25_to_March_29_2024
게시물 검색

(사)인하우스카운슬포럼 In-House Counsel Forum

주소 : 서울시 강남구 테헤란로 625, 17층

고유번호 : 107-82-14795 | 대표자 : 박철영

대표번호 : 02-6091-1998

E-mail : reps@ihcf.co.kr

Copyright(C) IHCF KOREA. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

PC 버전으로 보기